I was appalled and almost shrank back from my computer upon opening my DAILY email from VS.
"NEW! The Relaxed Boyfriend Jean in deconstructed sandblast"
This outfit completely obliterates the figure of an otherwise beautiful model and nominates her for the next candidate of TLC's "What Not to Wear." What is even more atrocious is that these jeans retail at $69.50. Not to mention the $48 tag for the sloppy unflattering tee!!
If this is the way that fashion is headed, I think I can safely go back to Thrift Store shopping to stay in vogue.
This outfit completely obliterates the figure of an otherwise beautiful model and nominates her for the next candidate of TLC's "What Not to Wear." What is even more atrocious is that these jeans retail at $69.50. Not to mention the $48 tag for the sloppy unflattering tee!!
If this is the way that fashion is headed, I think I can safely go back to Thrift Store shopping to stay in vogue.
Pete Futa
It's like they took it from real homeless people to sell to people who only have brand name sense and obviously too much money.
December 5, 2008 at 10:29am
Arlene Navo Richard
Someone needs to tell VS that fads from the '80s (i.e. really faded jeans with rolled-up cuffs) just don't work...not even on supermodels. :/
December 5, 2008 at 12:28pm
Pete Futa
But why were we so gullible the first time around? Fool me once....
December 5, 2008 at 1:30pm
Katharine Keenan
The ripped jeans I had when I was younger didn't come that way, they were just worn out. And they weren't shapeless either. Why a woman would pay $70 to look like a sloppy man is beyond me.
December 5, 2008 at 3:13pm
Jeffrey Fitzgerald
You guys are missing the whole point. It's what's on the inside that counts.
December 5, 2008 at 3:22pm
Jeffrey Fitzgerald
December 5, 2008 at 5:55pm
I wasn't really thinking with my heart exactly.
No comments:
Post a Comment